RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Drafting group - PDP on transfer denial reasons

[Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>]

Michael and all,
The scope is narrow, see the adopted Council motion from last week below.
Best regards

Olof

Motion 1
=========

The GNSO Council approved the creation of a drafting team charged with 
producing a recommendation for Council deliberation that includes precise 
wording for the 4  provisions for reason for denial of Inter-Registrar 
transfers.
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/final-report-irt-policy-09apr08.pdf
Drafting is open to participants from all constituencies, Nominating Committee 
appointees and liaisons to the GNSO Council.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Collins [mailto:michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: den 22 april 2008 16:02
To: Olof Nordling; gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] Drafting group - PDP on transfer denial reasons

Hi All,

I would like to know the scope of our work before commenting.

Are we only going to better define these four transfer denial reasons based
upon our interpretation of the intent of the original Task Force or should
we address issues apparently not considered by the Task Force such as
registrar practices that did not exist in 2003 or fraud techniques developed
in response to the current Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy?

Best regards,
Michael Collins
Internet Commerce Association
+1. 202 657 4570
+1. 407 242 9009 mobile


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:45 AM
To: gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-trans-pdp] Drafting group - PDP on transfer denial reasons

Dear all,
Thanks for joining this group! Others may still join, so let's have a "soft
launch" by noting that there is useful background reading in the Final
Report, posted at:
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/final-report-irt-policy-09apr08.pdf
In particular, if you want a quick intro, chapter 7 "Conclusions" gives an
overview and chapter 5 "Constituency views per issue" provides more details.

Also, I've compiled a table, attached, with the current texts of the
provisions, the "Points of Clarification document" (annexed to the Final
Report) suggestions and also proposed new texts, as supplied by two
constituencies. Please check it out and we can have an email dialogue on
this list as to whether that's useful as a starting point.

Very best regards

Olof

---------------------
Olof Nordling
Manager, Policy Development Coordination ICANN