<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-trans-wg] RE: Revised Document
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] RE: Revised Document
- From: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:11:40 -0800
Chuck and all,
I've been doing some "transfers documents forensics", preparing for the
housekeeping section of our document. In so doing I found that we can just
discard the letter references to the issues - contrary to what I said
yesterday. As I recalled, the letters do refer to the 23 August -08 document
from the Transfers Review Group, but only in an indirect way. Since that
document had multiple headings with issues for each heading numbered 1, 2, 3
etc, the prioritization group introduced a reference a,b,c... sequentially for
all the issues when they began their work. They finally ended up with the
numeric references we've now got, which also gives that group's verdict on
priority order. Those numeric references are fine to keep for us (I'll explain
and link to the relevant document in my homework), but the letter references
are pretty useless and can/should be skipped. Saves ink and bits.
Best regards
Olof
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: den 6 mars 2008 00:31
To: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] Revised Document
Here is the latest version of our PDP recommendations as promised. Note that
the changes we agreed to in today's call are highlighted; please verify that I
have captured them correctly and communicate any errors on this list ASAP so
that I can prepare a clean document by Monday of next week. Also note that
there are two sections as follows that I added at the end of the document: 1)
my summary of the discussion we had regarding ordering of the PDPs; 2) meeting
details for next week that I repeat here: Wednesday, 12 March, 16:00 UTC (09:00
PDT Los Angeles, 11:00 CDT Cedar Rapids, 17:00 CET Brussels). This is one hour
later than today's meeting - note that those of us in the U.S. will be on
daylight savings time and I think I properly reflected that in the times shown.
Action Items for Next Week
All: review the attached document and communicate any corrections or suggested
changes to this list NLT Sunday, 9 March
Chuck: prepare a clean version of the attached document with added text to
create a draft version of our recommendations for the Council and distribute it
ASAP before next week's call
Olof: prepare a draft version of text that will be integrated with Chuck's
draft as part of the recommendations document to the Council (e.g., references
to related documents, members of the WG, numbering scheme for recommendations
and priorities, etc.)
Agenda for Next Week
1. Finalize recommendations with regard to PDP order, priorities, etc.
2. Review and edit draft documents distributed by Chuck & Olof
3. Make plans for finalizing and sending our recommendations to the Council.
Thanks for your cooperation,
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it
is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use,
distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the
original transmission."
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|