ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-trans-wg] RE: Revised Document

  • To: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] RE: Revised Document
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:01:41 -0500

Thanks Olof.


        From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:12 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: Revised Document

        Chuck and all,

        I've been doing some "transfers documents forensics", preparing
for the housekeeping section of our document. In so doing I found that
we can just discard the letter references to the issues - contrary to
what I said yesterday. As I recalled, the letters do refer to the 23
August -08 document from the Transfers Review Group, but only in an
indirect way. Since that document had multiple headings with issues for
each heading numbered 1, 2, 3 etc, the prioritization group introduced a
reference a,b,c... sequentially for all the issues when they began their
work. They finally ended up with the numeric references we've now got,
which also gives that group's verdict on priority order. Those numeric
references are fine to keep for us (I'll explain and link to the
relevant document in my homework), but the letter references are pretty
useless and can/should be skipped. Saves ink and bits. 


        Best regards





        From: owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: den 6 mars 2008 00:31
        To: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] Revised Document


        Here is the latest version of our PDP recommendations as
promised.  Note that the changes we agreed to in today's call are
highlighted; please verify that I have captured them correctly and
communicate any errors on this list ASAP so that I can prepare a clean
document by Monday of next week.  Also note that there are two sections
as follows that I added at the end of the document: 1) my summary of the
discussion we had regarding ordering of the PDPs; 2) meeting details for
next week that I repeat here: Wednesday, 12 March, 16:00 UTC (09:00 PDT
Los Angeles, 11:00 CDT Cedar Rapids, 17:00 CET Brussels).  This is one
hour later than today's meeting - note that those of us in the U.S. will
be on daylight savings time and I think I properly reflected that in the
times shown.


        Action Items for Next Week


        All:  review the attached document and communicate any
corrections or suggested changes to this list NLT Sunday, 9 March


        Chuck:  prepare a clean version of the attached document with
added text to create a draft version of our recommendations for the
Council and distribute it ASAP before next week's call


        Olof:  prepare a draft version of text that will be integrated
with Chuck's draft as part of the recommendations document to the
Council (e.g., references to related documents, members of the WG,
numbering scheme for recommendations and priorities, etc.)


        Agenda for Next Week

        1.      Finalize recommendations with regard to PDP order,
priorities, etc. 
        2.      Review and edit draft documents distributed by Chuck &
        3.      Make plans for finalizing and sending our
recommendations to the Council. 

        Thanks for your cooperation,


        Chuck Gomes


        "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy