Re: [gnso-travel-dt] meeting with Dough Brent and Denise

["Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Zahid,
Doug will confirm the room for the meeting on Tuesday 18 PM.
Are we having a preparation meeting?
Olga

2008/11/2 Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  I would like to join the meeting.  Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> Zahid Jamil
>
> Barrister-at-law
>
> Jamil & Jamil
>
> Barristers-at-law
>
> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
>
> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
>
> Cell: +923008238230
>
> Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
>
> Fax: +92 21 5655026
>
> www.jamilandjamil.com
>
>
>
> Notice / Disclaimer
>
> This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
> communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
> recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
> message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
> contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law,
> and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client
> privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of
> any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing
> it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or
> incidentally to some other use of this publication) without prior written
> permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* 02 November 2008 14:35
> *To:* Tim Ruiz
> *Cc:* gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Glen_de_Saint_Géry
> *Subject:* [gnso-travel-dt] meeting with Dough Brent and Denise
>
>
>
> Thanks Tim.
> About the meeting, Dough is proposing Tuesday 18:00 from 30 to 60 minutes.
> I think it is a good opportunity to talk to them for clarification.
> Please let me know who wants to join the meeting, I also suggest that we
> make some previous preparation, exchanging ideas on the list or face to
> face.
> Regards
> Olga
>
>  2008/11/2 Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I think what we need to know is how we can use the money. The posted
> policy seems clear that it is only for ICANN Meetings. But can the
> constituencies decide to use it otherwise? It also only allows full
> support for a traveler, can we figure out a way around that?
>
> I thought those were the questions we were looking to get answered as
> the answers will frame the details of our work. Otherwise, I think Greg
> provided a good first draft of some text we can work with, we just don't
> know yet if everything we'd like to do is actually doable.
>
> Tim
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-travel-dt] answer from Denise
> From: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, October 31, 2008 6:01 pm
> To: gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx, "Glen_de_Saint_Géry"
> <glen@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Dear collegues,
> please note the response from Denise, I think we should meet her and D.
> Brent anyway to exchange some ideas and ask for clarification.
> Any comments?
> Glen, could you chech with Denise and Dough their availability for
> meetings?
> See you tomorrow, regards
> Olga
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Denise Michel <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2008/10/30
> Subject: Re: Meeting in Cairo
> To: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, Glen
> de Saint Géry <glen@xxxxxxxxx>, Doug Brent <doug.brent@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Hello, Olga.
>
> Thank you for your email.  I'm copying our COO, Doug Brent, as he
> oversees ICANN's Community Travel Support.
>
> The question you raise should be addressed by the GNSO, rather than
> ICANN Staff.  Staff is expecting to receive recommendations from the
> GNSO on how travel funds should allocated to best meet the needs of
> the GNSO community.  (Note that ICANN's Travel Procedure states "In
> summary, the new community travel procedure proposes to allocate funds
> (based on a transparent calculation methodology) for the use of each
> SO in traveling to ICANN meetings. Each SO will agree on a process
> appropriate to that SO for determining the constituent members to be
> supported."
> <
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/travel-support/revised-procedure-11aug08-en.htm
> >)
>
> The Stakeholder Groups will not be formally established until the
> April - June 2009 time frame (please see my emails to the GNSO Council
> list on this issue).  The GNSO may want to create a process now for
> the allocation of travel funds with the intention of reviewing and, if
> needed, revising it as implementation plans for GNSO
> Improvements/Restructuring are completed.  The Stakeholder Group will
> be an entity made up of formally recognized constituencies
> (constituencies would not "report to" Stakeholder Groups as you
> noted).  Staff expects Stakeholder Groups to be concerned with matters
> relevant to the interaction of those constituencies (e.g. SG
> membership and GNSO Council seat allocation) and not, as a general
> practice, prescribe activities inside or within constituencies that
> are otherwise the province of the GNSO Council and ICANN Board.
>
> I would be happy to meet with the group in Cairo if you need more
> information about the GNSO's transition.  If you have questions about
> ICANN's Travel Procedure, Doug Brent would be the best person to meet
> with you.  Glen and can help arrange either/both.
>
> Regards,
> Denise
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Dear Denise,
> >
> > A drafting team formed by some GNSO Council Members is in the process of
> > elaborating a Travel Support Policy document for the administration of
> > Travel Funds for GNSO.
> >
> > In this process and after two conference calls and some exchange of
> ideas,
> > we have realized that we need clarification of certain definitions and
> > concepts related with the future structure of the GNSO.
> >
> > This clarification and related definitions will allow us to continue
> > drafting the Travel Support Policy Document.
> >
> > As we understand, in the future structure of the GNSO, the Council will
> be
> > mainly divided into four stakeholder groups and constituencies will
> report
> > to each stakeholder group.
> >
> > Taking this in consideration we would like to know, if the constituencies
> > will be the representatives in the GNSO or this role will be handled by
> each
> > stakeholder group.
> >
> > This definition is relevant in relation with the travel funds, as they
> may
> > be recieved by constituencies or by the stakeholder groups.
> >
> > It will very helpful to recieve your comments on this regard as soon as
> > possible, and also if you could meet with our drafting team during our
> next
> > face to face meeting in Cairo.
> >
> > We will appreciate your comments on this regard.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > Olga Cavalli
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Denise Michel
> ICANN VP, Policy
> denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx
> +1.408.429.3072
>
>
>
>
>
>
>