Re: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico City meeting

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Olga.

I believe Glen has already added me to the group.

Thanks to you both.

Stéphane


Le 09/01/09 15:47, « Olga Cavalli » <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Hi,
> Thanks Tim and Greg for starting the exchange of ideas again.
> 
> Glen, could you please add Stephane Van Gelder to this drafting group?, as
> requested yesterday on the call.
> 
> Should we need to set up a date/time for conference call or just work online
> on the list?
> 
> Regards and have a nice weekend!
> 
> Olga
> 
> 2009/1/8 Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>>> > We might want to give preference to those constituencies
>>> > that used fewer slots last time.
>> 
>> How about this:
>> 
>> NCUC ­ 2
>> ISPC ­ 2
>> RyC ­ 2
>> BC ­ 1
>> RrC ­ 2
>> IPC ­ 2
>> 
>> Then leave it up to the constituencies whether or not to split up the
>> funds. They could either fund two people fully or one full and two
>> split. The BC (who had three fully funded last time) could fund one
>> fully or one for airfare and a second for the lodging per diem.
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico City
>> meeting
>> From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, January 08, 2009 3:16 pm
>> To: gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> All,
>>         I would observe that ICANN funded travel support for the Cairo
>> meeting (excluding NCAs) was as follows.
>> 
>> Gross, Robin - NCUC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
>> Harris, Tony - ISPC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
>> Hoover, Carolyn - RyC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
>> Jamil,Zahid - BC Financial Need - Economy
>> Klein, Norbert - NCUC - Financial Need - Economy
>> Rossette, Kristina - IPC - Financial Need - Expenses Only
>> Rodenbaugh, Mike - BC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
>> Sheppard, Philip - BC - Complies with ICANN policy - Economy
>> Walton, Clarke - RrC - Constituency 1st choice ­ Economy
>> 
>> That is, the GNSO constituencies used the following numbers of travel
>> support "slots" (for a total of 9):
>> 
>> NCUC ­ 2
>> ISPC ­ 1
>> RyC ­ 1
>> BC ­ 3
>> RrC ­ 1
>> IPC ­ 1
>> 
>> Therefore, out of the 20 slots allotted by ICANN for consituency travel
>> to the Cairo and Mexico City meetings, theoretically 11 are still
>> available for travel to the Mexico City meeting.
>> 
>> We might want to give preference to those constituencies that used fewer
>> slots last time.
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>