Re: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico City meeting

["Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
Thanks Tim and Greg for starting the exchange of ideas again.

Glen, could you please add Stephane Van Gelder to this drafting group?, as
requested yesterday on the call.

Should we need to set up a date/time for conference call or just work online
on the list?

Regards and have a nice weekend!

Olga

2009/1/8 Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> > We might want to give preference to those constituencies
> > that used fewer slots last time.
>
> How about this:
>
> NCUC – 2
> ISPC – 2
> RyC – 2
> BC – 1
> RrC – 2
> IPC – 2
>
> Then leave it up to the constituencies whether or not to split up the
> funds. They could either fund two people fully or one full and two
> split. The BC (who had three fully funded last time) could fund one
> fully or one for airfare and a second for the lodging per diem.
>
> Tim
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico City
> meeting
> From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, January 08, 2009 3:16 pm
> To: gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>
> All,
>        I would observe that ICANN funded travel support for the Cairo
> meeting (excluding NCAs) was as follows.
>
> Gross, Robin - NCUC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
> Harris, Tony - ISPC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
> Hoover, Carolyn - RyC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
> Jamil,Zahid - BC Financial Need - Economy
> Klein, Norbert - NCUC - Financial Need - Economy
> Rossette, Kristina - IPC - Financial Need - Expenses Only
> Rodenbaugh, Mike - BC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
> Sheppard, Philip - BC - Complies with ICANN policy - Economy
> Walton, Clarke - RrC - Constituency 1st choice – Economy
>
> That is, the GNSO constituencies used the following numbers of travel
> support "slots" (for a total of 9):
>
> NCUC – 2
> ISPC – 1
> RyC – 1
> BC – 3
> RrC – 1
> IPC – 1
>
> Therefore, out of the 20 slots allotted by ICANN for consituency travel
> to the Cairo and Mexico City meetings, theoretically 11 are still
> available for travel to the Mexico City meeting.
>
> We might want to give preference to those constituencies that used fewer
> slots last time.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>