ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-travel-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico City meeting

  • To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico City meeting
  • From: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:42:57 -0200

Hi,
I have drafted a small table containing the name of constituencies and the
funded travellers in Cairo and Tim proposal for Mexico, I also added in the
right a column with the possible total funded travellers per constituency.

We should exchange ideas fast as constituencies must decide by Jan 22nd.

Have a good week and regards to all.

Olga


*Constituencies*

*Cairo meeting*

*Mexico meeting*

*Tim Proposal*

*Total per constituency*

NCUC

2

2

4

ISPC

1

2

3

RyC

1

2

3

BC

3

1

4

RrC

1

2

3

IPC

1

2

3









*Total*

*9*

*11*

*20*














2009/1/9, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi,
> Thanks Tim and Greg for starting the exchange of ideas again.
>
> Glen, could you please add Stephane Van Gelder to this drafting group?, as
> requested yesterday on the call.
>
> Should we need to set up a date/time for conference call or just work
> online on the list?
>
> Regards and have a nice weekend!
>
> Olga
>
> 2009/1/8 Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> > We might want to give preference to those constituencies
>> > that used fewer slots last time.
>>
>>
>> How about this:
>>
>> NCUC – 2
>> ISPC – 2
>> RyC – 2
>> BC – 1
>> RrC – 2
>> IPC – 2
>>
>> Then leave it up to the constituencies whether or not to split up the
>> funds. They could either fund two people fully or one full and two
>> split. The BC (who had three fully funded last time) could fund one
>> fully or one for airfare and a second for the lodging per diem.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico City
>> meeting
>> From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, January 08, 2009 3:16 pm
>> To: gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>> All,
>>        I would observe that ICANN funded travel support for the Cairo
>> meeting (excluding NCAs) was as follows.
>>
>> Gross, Robin - NCUC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
>> Harris, Tony - ISPC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
>> Hoover, Carolyn - RyC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
>> Jamil,Zahid - BC Financial Need - Economy
>> Klein, Norbert - NCUC - Financial Need - Economy
>> Rossette, Kristina - IPC - Financial Need - Expenses Only
>> Rodenbaugh, Mike - BC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
>> Sheppard, Philip - BC - Complies with ICANN policy - Economy
>> Walton, Clarke - RrC - Constituency 1st choice – Economy
>>
>> That is, the GNSO constituencies used the following numbers of travel
>> support "slots" (for a total of 9):
>>
>> NCUC – 2
>> ISPC – 1
>> RyC – 1
>> BC – 3
>> RrC – 1
>> IPC – 1
>>
>> Therefore, out of the 20 slots allotted by ICANN for consituency travel
>> to the Cairo and Mexico City meetings, theoretically 11 are still
>> available for travel to the Mexico City meeting.
>>
>> We might want to give preference to those constituencies that used fewer
>> slots last time.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy