<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Re: TRAVEL DRAFTING TEAM COMMENTS NEEDED - Travel funding request from the Vertical Integration WG co-chairs
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Re: TRAVEL DRAFTING TEAM COMMENTS NEEDED - Travel funding request from the Vertical Integration WG co-chairs
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 08:45:25 -0400
Hi,
You are still misquoting. And perhaps it is intentional.
My point was that if an SG has funds it is not using, perhaps because they
don't believe in having their member's transportation paid fo,r then maybe they
can consider it.
If your SG can't or doesn't want to fine, but please don't go around
misattributing my motives or intentions.
If you don't like the idea, also fine, but I would appreciate not having it
mischaracterized.
a.
On 25 May 2010, at 08:19, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> Whether you can't or you won't, you are saying that other SGs should donate
> where yours isn't willing to.
>
> I prefer we look for a solution where everybody is able to contribute,
> instead of placing the burden on some people and not others.
>
> Stéphane
>
> Le 25 mai 2010 à 13:12, Avri Doria a écrit :
>
>>
>> On 25 May 2010, at 06:32, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>>
>>> One last thing, I find Avri's proposed solution laughingly unfair. To say
>>> "let some SG take up this funding by donating their slots, but be warned
>>> that our SG would never do that" makes that argument very difficult to hear
>>> in my opinion.
>>
>> That is not what I said.
>>
>> I said we can't. Please do not misquote.
>>
>> a.
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|