[gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Final UDRP Questionnaire

[<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ditto - and agreed!
 
I won't be able to be on the call on Tuesday as I'll be teaching class.
I support having an academic on the webinar panel, and would suggest
Michael Froomkin (Miami) or Michael Geist (Ottawa).
 
Cheers
Mary

 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 


From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:"Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx"
<gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
CC:"'Margie Milam'" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 4/19/2011 5:28 PM
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Final UDRP Questionnaire

I support the changes by Kristina.  Great job all.
 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
Please note new address starting March 21, 2011:  21575 Ridgetop
Circle, Sterling VA 20166     
 


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
 

 

From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:11 PM
To: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Margie Milam'
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Final UDRP Questionnaire

 
Margie and all,
 
This looked great.  I made some additional tweaks in the attached. (Due
to a document issue, I had to accept all of the revisions and make
additional ones so that mine were visible.)
 
Tweaks are:
 
1.  Referring to "disputed domain name" (which is UDRP speak);
2.  Changing 3.g so we don't have the "favourable" issue that was
raised w/r/t 3.f.
3.  Changed "cases" to "proceedings" where appropriate;
4.  Changed 3.k to refer to "contested or challenged", which is what I
suspect we really are asking.
 
K
 
 


 

From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 1:59 PM
To: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Final UDRP Questionnaire
Dear All,
 
Please find attached the final version of the Questionnaire to be sent
out to UDRP Providers this week.    The attached document reflects
revisions suggested by Kristina Rosette and discussed on yesterday’s
call.  It also includes revisions suggested by Staff to clarify the
voluntary nature of the inquiry, and to provide additional background
for the UDRP providers who may be surprised to receive an inquiry from
Staff.
 
Please provide any final comments by COB tomorrow, April 20th.  I plan
to release the Questionnaire to the providers  on Thursday morning. 
 
The Webinar is set for Tuesday, May 10th, at 8am Pacific (1500 UTC). 
The next Drafting Team meeting on Tuesday of next week (1500 UTC) will
focus on identifying the speakers to be invited to the webinar. 

Best regards,
Margie
________
 
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
________