<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] First stab at objectives and a definition of VI
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] First stab at objectives and a definition of VI
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:04:51 +0100
>
> Now that you and I have both stated the positions that kept us a loggerheads
> in the NCSG debate on this, and the reason we both wanted to be on this DT, I
> am hoping that some of he other members of the DT join in. I would hate to
> see a repeat of our long and sometimes acrimonious debate.
>
> cheers,
>
> a.
I have to admit this is a scary start to this DT...
Anyway, working out a definition for VI seems like a reasonable approach. It
also seems reasonable to try and taylor this definition to the real-world ICANN
situation we are tasked with looking at.
So just to make sure I got this right, the definition that is being proposed at
this stage is the following?
Vertical integration is defined as a business structure in which there is no
separation between the registry operator and the registrar; they are owned and
operated by the same company and the domain name supplier is not required to
provide access to independent firms to sell names under its TLD.
Stéphane
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|