Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am not sure if this is needed, but I second Stéphane as the coordinator for 
this DT

Jeff
 

----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun Feb 07 06:34:23 2010
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT


Thanks Stephane.

Having seen no other volunteers or nominations or objections, I suggest that 
Stephane serve as the coordinator for this DT.  If anyone objects, do so by 
providing an alternative.  Otherwise, he will serve as coordinator and will 
function neutrally in that capacity, being careful to distinguish between his 
role as coordinator and RrSG Councilor or individual.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 1:47 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Avri Doria; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
> 
> It seems my answer to this email did not reach the full list, 
> so just to make sure everyone knows that I agreed to be 
> coordinator if that can help the group.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 5 févr. 2010 à 13:28, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> 
> > 
> > Stephane,
> > 
> > Would you be willing to do this?
> > 
> > Chuck
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:25 AM
> >> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Vertical Integration PDP Charter DT
> >> 
> >> 
> >> hi,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 4 Feb 2010, at 09:30, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Likewise with a chair, isn't it the WG that needs a chair? 
> >>>> DTs need chair's too? 
> >>> 
> >>> Chuck: I believe it is helpful to have leadership in most
> >> efforts.  I
> >>> don't care what we call it.  Who is going to keep the ball
> >> rolling if
> >>> we do not identify a person or persons to assume that
> >> responsibility?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> on something as short lived as I hope this DT is, I would like to 
> >> suggest that a council member, perhaps the chair of 
> v-chair, be the 
> >> one to coordinate our efforts with the assistance of the Margie.
> >> 
> >> i 'nominate' Stephane.
> >> 
> >> Once it comes time to start the WG, I recommend that whoever 
> >> coordinates the DT effort, or the Council liaison, be the one to 
> >> initiate the WG until such time as the group selects a 
> chair, whose 
> >> selection will need to be reviewed by the council.
> >> 
> >> a.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> 
>