<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Please participate - straw poll on objective 5
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Please participate - straw poll on objective 5
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:46:14 -0400
All,
I am having a REAL hard time responding to this poll because I don't understand
the objective and how it relates to the other objectives. In addition, I have
no idea if we vote for objective 5, even the amended one, how that relates to
the timeframes in the charter. Third, I do not see anywhere in the charter
where there is time to consult the experts necessary to even figure out the
answers to the amended version 5. Fourth, I look at the other objectives which
reference the latest version of the DAG which given the recent board resolution
seem to be out dated. Finally, in the amended version of Objective 5 and I it
seems to be implicit in that objective that ICANN has in fact collected enough
information to be able to make an assessment on "HOW (a) INTERNET USERS IN
GENERAL AND (b) REGISTRANTS OF DOMAIN NAMES, AND (c) THE RETAIL AND WHOLESALE
MARKETS FOR DOMAIN NAMES ARE EFFECTED BY THE CHANGES TO the current
restrictions and/or practices concerning registry-registrar separation and
equivalent, non-discriminatory access." I do not believe that ICANN has
collected this information at all!
So, I guess my vote will have to be "None of the Above" or "I am completely
confused as to why we are doing this exercise".
Isn't the only real objective now Objective 1: "Objective 1: To make policy
recommendations that provide clear direction to ICANN staff and new gTLD
applicants on whether, and if so under what conditions, contracts for new gTLD
registries can permit vertical integration or otherwise deviate from current
forms of registry-registrar separation, and equivalent access and
non-discriminatory access."
The other objectives may be work items under that Work Item (I.e., documenting
existing practices, articulating the changes proposed ...), but not independent
objectives in and of themselves.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 3:13 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Please participate - straw poll on objective 5
Dear All,
As discussed in today's VI PDP WG meeting, please find below the link to the
straw poll on objective 5. Please complete the survey by close of business
Wednesday 24 March at the latest.
Link to survey: http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22AE9E3HKG7
With best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|