ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Time of the call

  • To: "'Kristian Ørmen'" <kristian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Time of the call
  • From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:15:31 +0100

Thanks, Kristian. Good point.
But maybe we are making assumptions that do not correspond to 100% of the
reality. Are we sure that, if we have volounteers participating, the "normal
working hours" are always the best choice?
We might well have in the WG people who are not professionals of the
registration business, but users of the DNS, who might well be busy during
working hours doing something else for a living.
Just a comment. We'll see how others respond.
Cheers,
Roberto
 


  _____  

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kristian Ørmen
Sent: Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:47
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Time of the call



I agree that it should be the same day and time every week.
I would propose the time to be 15:00 UTC. That way it would be in normal
working hours for both America, Europe and most of Africa. And better than
the time today for Asia/pacific.


Kind regards
Kristian Ørmen



Den 23/03/2010 kl. 19.09 skrev Roberto Gaetano:


Folks, 
During the call, Eric has raised the issue of the time being inconvenient
for Asia Pacific. 
May I ask if anybody has problems with calls on Tuesdays 16:30 UTC, for 60'
or 90'? 
You can also reply privately. 
If there is some problem, we might consider two different times (and maybe
two different days of the week, if necessary) to make sure that we do not
make it inconvenient always for the same people.

Cheers, 
Roberto 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy