ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Idea of Phasing

  • To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Idea of Phasing
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:13:12 +0100

Tim,

No application goes to auction if it is not part of a contention set.

All applications which self-designate as a "community-based"
application are subject to additional restriction.

So ... you're concerned that .unlikely won't be in a contention set,
so it goes to contract, and exploits some hypothetical VI cutout, or
that .unlikely will be in a contention set, and meet the criteria for
comparative evaluation, and prevails over others in the contention
set, and then exploits some hypothetical VI cutout.

But it is gaming the hypothetical VI cutout, not the community
criteria, in the presence of the additional restriction.

How do you suggest the DAG be changed to eliminate the scenario you
have in mind, which I may still be misunderstanding?

Eric




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy