<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] 360 Degree Market Analysis with a focus on the consumer
- To: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Michael D. Palage'" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] 360 Degree Market Analysis with a focus on the consumer
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:53:05 -0400
In my opinion, we were just scratching the surface. The examples are
illustrative and not exhaustive. The point is that the new gTLD process should
not impose ex ante restrictions on business models based on a 1998 paradigm;
any restrictions need to be based on real consumer protection and competition
policy concerns.
--MM
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:17 PM
To: 'Michael D. Palage'; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] 360 Degree Market Analysis with a focus on the
consumer
Mike,
I think you've nailed my perspective on this matter. Best interest of
consumers first. What improves their experience is what we are after. What is
quickly becoming apparent, however, is that one size VI will not fit the myriad
of possibilities. How long is that list of scenarios? When you, Milton and
Avri created your scenarios, did you have a sense that you covered the spectrum
of possibilities or were just scratching the surface?
Kind regards,
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|