ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Question to WG on RAA

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Question to WG on RAA
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:41:45 +0200

>  
> Bottom line is that it would be unacceptable to Neustar to allow new TLD 
> registries to be able to do things that  Neustar is restricted from doing.  
> To do so would not only violate our existing agreements, but the ICANN bylaws 
> as well.  So when Jeff E. talks about 2-way streets, we need to make sure 
> that the streets are really 2-ways and not 2-ways for registrars, 1-way for 
> existing registries.
>  

Jeff, there is currently no policy regarding VI. So each gTLD registry contract 
is unique and has its own clauses. Are you saying you would like to see all 
existing gTLD registries bound by the same contract that is being drawn up for 
new gTLD registries?

Thanks,

Stéphane


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy