Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Call for agenda items

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

One addition.  Ref to Objective 6:  Will this delay the intro of new gTLDs?

On Apr 3, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> 
> good deal.  
> 
> i've been having a sidebar conversation about a possible proposal and came up 
> with a little series of questions.  what if each proponent took 5-10 minutes 
> to walk us through their ideas, touching on these questions in addition to 
> whatever else they want to tell us.  at least for me, i sometimes find it 
> helpful to write a series of "FAQ-like" questions and then answer them as a 
> way to quickly sketch out an idea.  anyway, here's a starter-kit, feel free 
> to add/subtract...
> 
> Pretty-Good Proposal FAQ:
> 
> - what is the proposal?
> 
> - are there changes needed in the Board resolution for this to work?
> 
> - is this a policy thing or a best-practices thing?
> 
> - what are the barriers in the way of doing this?
> 
> - what are the pros and cons?
> 
> - how do consumers fare?  
> 
> - is there experience out there already?  how about research or analysis?  
> any "foundation" documents that could be referenced?
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On Apr 2, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Richard Tindal wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Would be good for the proponent of each model to take 5 minutes and walk us 
>> through the detail of their proposal.  Not the pros and cons (yet) -- just 
>> how their proposal  would work
>> 
>> Also, would be good to start with a quick re-statement of definitions - so 
>> we're all speaking the same language. I've seen cross-ownership and vertical 
>> integration used interchangeably on this list,  though the WG has defined 
>> them differently.
>> 
>> RT
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 3, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> hi all,
>>> 
>>> we have a few agenda items (that won't take long and can go towards the end 
>>> of the agenda) for the call next Monday.  most of the time can be devoted 
>>> to whatever you all would like to discuss.
>>> 
>>> how would you like to use the time?  
>>> 
>>> the proposals, use-cases and scenarios seem to be evolving nicely on the 
>>> list.  would a discussion of some of those be useful?  any 
>>> proposal-champions want some real-time discussion time with the whole group?
>>> 
>>> are there background documents that would provide a good discussion?
>>> 
>>> we're building the agenda right now, so this is a good time to steer us 
>>> towards things that would help you advance your work.
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> 
>>> mikey
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>> phone       651-647-6109  
>>> fax                 866-280-2356  
>>> web         www.haven2.com
>>> handle      OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
>>> Google, etc.)
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 
>