<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?
- To: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 18:08:47 -0400
Ah - another registrar protectionist.
Good to see that the big'uns and the little'Uns can agree on something - united
against the rest of us...
If the formation of such a "Group" succeeds at blocking self-provision of
domain names, we will have to take this outside of ICANN and to the antitrust
authorities.
It would be a textbook case of restraint of trade.
--MM
________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Eric Brunner-Williams [ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
I agree that this concept not be pursued right now at all, as it is a
distraction from the policy the GNSO recommended to the Board, and
which the Board approved at Paris.
I propose that we form a "group" around the proposition that whatever
"single registrant" is or are (as it may be more than one distinct
thing), it is out of scope for the policy recommendation on changes,
if any, to the registry registrar separation business rule that has
existed up until the Nairobi Surprise.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|