Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I do not beleive that this can be unilaterally ruled out of scope.

I think that it is key to any VI solution and without it, the status quo as 
defined by the Board might as well remain in place as that only affect business 
arrangements as opposed to affecting innovative new models for TLDS.

a.

On 5 Apr 2010, at 15:52, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> 
> Tim,
> 
> I agree that this concept not be pursued right now at all, as it is a
> distraction from the policy the GNSO recommended to the Board, and
> which the Board approved at Paris.
> 
> I propose that we form a "group" around the proposition that whatever
> "single registrant" is or are (as it may be more than one distinct
> thing), it is out of scope for the policy recommendation on changes,
> if any, to the registry registrar separation business rule that has
> existed up until the Nairobi Surprise.
> 
> Eric