RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I agree that this concept not be pursued right now at all, as it is a
> distraction from the policy the GNSO recommended to the Board, and
> which the Board approved at Paris.

FWIW, I agree.

Tim 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, April 05, 2010 2:52 pm
To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>


Tim,

I agree that this concept not be pursued right now at all, as it is a
distraction from the policy the GNSO recommended to the Board, and
which the Board approved at Paris.

I propose that we form a "group" around the proposition that whatever
"single registrant" is or are (as it may be more than one distinct
thing), it is out of scope for the policy recommendation on changes,
if any, to the registry registrar separation business rule that has
existed up until the Nairobi Surprise.

Eric