RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric,

I disagree that it is out of scope and I think most of the group would disagree 
with you as well given today's discussions.  In fact, it was ICANN's own 
economists that first introduced the subject in the CRAI report.

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 3:53 PM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?


Tim,

I agree that this concept not be pursued right now at all, as it is a
distraction from the policy the GNSO recommended to the Board, and
which the Board approved at Paris.

I propose that we form a "group" around the proposition that whatever
"single registrant" is or are (as it may be more than one distinct
thing), it is out of scope for the policy recommendation on changes,
if any, to the registry registrar separation business rule that has
existed up until the Nairobi Surprise.

Eric