<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, Single Registrant TLDs
- To: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, Single Registrant TLDs
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:58:21 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> I have now followed all the rules and created an SR gTLD that looks and
> acts just like a regular gTLD. Differences: I may not have to pay the
> registry fee to ICANN, and my members definitely don't have to pay the
> registrar fee.
Did anyone propose that SR gTLDs did not have to pay a registry fee?
I thought the point of contention was the requirement to use registrars, the
registrar accreditation fee and, possibly, the per-registration fee.
--MM
- References:
- [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, PLEASE READ EMAIL BEFORE VIEWING ATTACHMENT!!!!!
- RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, PLEASE READ EMAIL BEFORE VIEWINGATTACHMENT!!!!!
- From: Thomas Barrett - EnCirca
- RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, PLEASE READ EMAIL BEFORE VIEWINGATTACHMENT!!!!!
- RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, PLEASE READ EMAIL BEFORE VIEWINGATTACHMENT!!!!!
- From: Thomas Barrett - EnCirca
- RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, PLEASE READ EMAIL BEFORE VIEWINGATTACHMENT!!!!!
- Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, PLEASE READ EMAIL BEFORE VIEWINGATTACHMENT!!!!!
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, PLEASE READ EMAIL BEFORE VIEWINGATTACHMENT!!!!!
- Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, Single Registrant TLDs
- RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, Single Registrant TLDs
- Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] VI Use Case Template, Single Registrant TLDs
- From: Antony Van Couvering
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|