Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Where's the link to that page Margie?

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 7 avr. 2010 à 23:01, Margie Milam a écrit :

> 
> Roberto,
> 
> We have a resource page on our WIKI that contains links to various documents 
> related to vertical integration.  I will update it to include terms commonly 
> used by the working group.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Margie
> _____________
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> ______________
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Roberto Gaetano [roberto@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: 'Ken Stubbs'; tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Avri Doria'; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?
> 
> Thanks, Ken, I should have proposed it.
> Unless I misread, most of the acronyms come from Avri.
> 
> Avri,
> Can you please start getting the ball rolling with an initial list?
> We will keep it up to date as we go (and as new jargon is used :<(
> 
> A question to staff.
> Don't we have an area where to keep reference material like this?
> 
> R.
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Stubbs
>> Sent: Wednesday, 07 April 2010 21:12
>> To: tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: 'Avri Doria'; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?
>> 
>> 
>> Ken Stubbs wrote:
>> 
>> Wouldn't hurt to put together a glossary of all the
>> abbreviations used in these emails as well (i.e. such as
>> sr,oco,srsu,srmu,ro)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/7/2010 11:39 AM, Thomas Barrett - EnCirca wrote:
>>> 
>>> We really need to stop and take some time to agree on some
>> definitions of
>>> the terms we are using.
>>> 
>>> I was assuming the whole purpose of discussing vertical
>> integration was that
>>> it might be a possible option for all and any new gtld
>> applicant, regardless
>>> of purpose or business model.
>>> 
>>> No one has said it should be limited to SR or
>> community-based applicants
>>> only.
>>> 
>>> Tom
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
>>> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 11:27 AM
>>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] What do we mean by "single registrant"?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7 Apr 2010, at 11:00, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> What advocate of "single registrant" is going to put a
>> motion on the
>>>> next Council agenda to recommend to the Board to direct Staff to
>>>> create a "single registrant" type of application?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> i do not see it as necessary.
>>> 
>>> i also do not see it as excluded from the current charter
>> as i see SR (both
>>> C and NC) and community based cultural/linguistic (CCL)
>> TLDs as being the
>>> only possible reasons for allowing any degree of VI.
>>> 
>>> and as I say, is see no reason yet, for>0CO especially if we have no
>>> possible reasons for any degree of VI
>>> 
>>> so, if SR is really off the table, then perhaps we are done.
>>> 
>>> a.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>