Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] A case for minority caps

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thx A. :)

S.

Le 8 avr. 2010 à 20:47, Avri Doria a écrit :

> 
> 
> On 8 Apr 2010, at 14:23, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> 
>> Avri,
>> 
>> Sorry to be annoying, and I know there's now a list of acronyms that we can 
>> refer to, but I'm finding your emails difficult to read because they're so 
>> heavily laden with abbreviations and I find it inconvenient to refer to the 
>> acronyms list every time.
>> 
>> Just a little personal feedback. Please feel free to disregard. May not be 
>> an issue for others.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Stéphane
> 
> Certainly, here is my message with the necessary translations - I will try to 
> spell everything out in the future.  it is one way to get me to write less.
> 
> 
> you explain why having some Rr ownership of Ry and Ry ownership of Rr can be 
> helpful especially in CCLs.
> 
> (Translation: you explain why having some Registrar ownership of Registry  
> and Registry ownership of Registrar can be helpful especially in community 
> cultural/linguistic TLDs.")
> 
> why a cap? 
> why nominally 15%?
> 
> (Translation: why nominally fifteen percent)
> 
> why restrict to minority?
> is there gradient in the benefit?  
> is there a point where the %age is too high and the benefit stops in your 
> calculation?
> 
> (Translation: is there a point where the percentage is too high and the 
> benefit stops in your calculation?)
> 
> cheers
> 
> a.
>