<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Joint Proposal
- To: "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Joint Proposal
- From: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:10:55 -0700
Team MMA,
First off MMA is the best acronym yet, now I think of Mixed Martial Arts
competitions inside a steel cage. Thanks for that.
The proposal looks good and look forward to hearing the details tomorrow.
I do not want to jump the gun on the list but would like to ask a question that
I hope you can address in your presentation tomorrow. The 15% limit is a legacy
number that I believe is contractually based and is rooted in the VeriSign /
NSI sale and how they structured the deal.
Could you discuss tomorrow the value of maintaining that 15% limit going
forward ? Why is that the appropriate percentage of ownership? How is 15%
better than 5% or 51% or 100% ?
Thanks
Jeff E
________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Michael D. Palage [michael@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 9:18 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Joint Proposal
Hello All,
Attached is the proposal which is being jointly submitted by Avri, Milton and
myself to the working group for consideration. We look forward to formally
presenting this concept to the group on tomorrow’s call, and answering any
questions that you may have.
Best regards,
Michael Palage (on behalf of Team MMA)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|