Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Weekly status report -- good

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

if time permits I'd like to discuss this on todays call

I'm in favour of treating SR as a sub-group issue

RT



On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> 
> May I draw the attention of the group on the last line in Mikey's report:
>       Discuss the possibility of treating SR as a sub-group/proposal
> It would help if, in anticipation of today's call, we could already have
> some input on whether this would be an useful or a distracting option.
> Cheers,
> Roberto
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
> Sent: Monday, 12 April 2010 01:34
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Weekly status report -- good
> 
> hi all,
> 
> a somewhat abbreviated status-report.  i've arrived at the home of friends
> in North Carolina.  Marcie and i will be spending a week here goofing off
> (except for reading VI email and participating in VI calls, of course).  
> 
> so the status is "good" in many senses of the word.  here's the report.
> 
> mikey
> 
> <VI Status report 3 Sheet1.pdf>