Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Benefits of Cross Owenship - Presentation

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff E.

Thank you for clarifying your views.

In a nutshell, where CORE asserts that benefit can exist through seven
(or so, depending on the hypothetical ownership cap of the moment)
registries sharing a registrar, offering equal access to any other,
possibly zero, or more, initial registrar(s), DEMANDMEDIA's response
is that CORE is mistaken, and such benefit can only arise from an
unshared registrar, unique to each registry, and optionally, offering
equal access to any other, possibly zero, or more, initial registrar(s).

So there is no basis for attempting to find a position common to both
CORE and DEMANDMEDIA.

I didn't think that was necessary, but I appreciate that advocacy has
its logic of necessity. Thanks for your time.

Eric

On 4/12/10 11:31 AM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
> The benefits stated in the presentation are with 100% Cross Ownership. 
> 
> I do believe the benefits stated would not exist with minority ownership. The 
> efficiencies and the decision making possibilities may not exist in minority 
> ownership 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Eric Brunner-Williams [ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 5:12 AM
> To: Jeff Eckhaus
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Benefits of Cross Owenship - Presentation
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> I don't see any numbers in your presentation of benefits.
> 
> Am I correct in understanding you that the condition of minority
> ownership, whether by registries in one or more registrars, or by
> registrars in one or more registries, is insufficient to cause these
> benefits to exist?
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
>