<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Innovative Proposal
- To: "'Eric Brunner-Williams'" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Innovative Proposal
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:30:03 -0400
>
> CORE's position is that the
> registrar(s) in which a registry has CAP-or-less ownership shall sell
> names in that TLD.
Eric,
Good. This is a surprise, it's nice to see that the CORE proposal has some more
liberal element in it.
So can you provide some explanation of the reasoning to me? Why is it ok for 7
or more registries to share cross-ownership and sell their own tld and not ok
for one, two, or three registries to do so? What is the policy basis for this
requirement? Competition? Consumer protection? What?
Milton Mueller
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
------------------------------
Internet Governance Project:
http://internetgovernance.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|