<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Notice: VI Call Thursday with the Economists Salop/Wright at 20:UTC
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Notice: VI Call Thursday with the Economists Salop/Wright at 20:UTC
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:18:23 -0400
Hi,
I think the more calls with economists or regulators or competition authority
experts ... that have some clue to offer all the better. And since these will
be recorded, it offers a resource we can go back to. Perhaps we can even ask
for them to be transcribed.
I would suggest that if any of us can't make it, perhaps we can send in a
question that the Chair's can ask on our behalf.
thanks
a.
On 28 Apr 2010, at 11:50, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>
> Their report is out there for reveiw by anyone. I have not heard any
> reason why it will benefit the WG to have a special call with them. And
> I would expect that if we do, others will be allowed to arrange similar
> calls with other economists they may like the WG to consult.
>
> Tim
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Notice: VI Call Thursday with the
> Economists Salop/Wright at 20:UTC
> From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, April 28, 2010 10:14 am
> To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Margie,
>
> First, I appreciate the scheduling of Salop and Wright at some other
> time than Monday.
>
> I'm cc'ing the Working Group list as it is possible that some have
> heard Mssrs. Salop and Wright fewer times than I have, and may have
> the impression that the economists retained by ICANN have conducted an
> independent study of the actual market for name to address mapping
> services.
>
> Second, would you be so kind as to pass on two questions to each?
>
> Q1. What specific facts about public resource identifiers (aka "domain
> names") and the public routing infrastructure (aka "addresses") and
> their technical coordination and management are relevant to each of
> their recommendations?
>
> Q2. Assuming one or more specific facts are relevant to their
> recommendations, what change to that fact or facts would be necessary
> to cause a change in each of their recommendations?
>
> I prefer a written response, as it is easier to cite than an offset in
> an audio log, and it allows the response, if any, to be studied,
> rather than a spontaneous utterance.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Eric
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|