RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Notice: VI Call Thursday with the Economists Salop/Wright at 20:UTC

[Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mike, Roberto and all,

Does the group request that staff pursue the CRAI-related information noted 
below?   If so we would be glad to look into it further, but because staff 
resources are limited, I want to make sure our efforts are focused on the top 
priority tasks of the group.

Thanks, Liz

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 12:56 PM
To: Margie Milam
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Notice: VI Call Thursday with the Economists 
Salop/Wright at 20:UTC


Margie,

A follow-up note.

Over in the High Security TLD Advisory Group Greg Rattray (ICANN
Staff) has managed to locate the original letter that Paul Twomey
submitted to BITS (June/July 2009) which Michael Palage requested as
that letter, in his words (which I agree with) "appears to be the
original genesis of this group's [the HSTLD-AG] work."

I request that the information provided to CRAI, the ICANN provided
scope statement to CRAI, which presumably is reflected in the work
product we know as the CRAI Report of Q4 2008, and which I think
appears to be the original genesis of this group's [the GNSO-VI-Feb10
PDP] work, be dug up and provided to me.

Others may have an interest in it as well, I don't know, I simply know
my own interests.

I suspect it is in correspondence. Some time mid-2008.

I want to know who decided, and when, to put one, or both, of "single
registrant" and "relaxation of the vertical separation" issues, on the
policy development agenda.

Thanks in advance,
Eric