RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Face to face meeting

["Vanda UOL" <vanda@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I guess most of the member will be there. Saturday early in the morning
Board normally doesn't meet, so will be fine for me. 
Vanda
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sébastien Bachollet
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 1:19 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Mike O'Connor'
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Face to face meeting


Thanks Mikey for that proposal.
After reading the e-mails send by various participants, please find my
inputs:
Saturday morning is OK (and the best option) and the day(s) before also if
the decision is taken quickly.
Sunday is NOT an option, it is "Sunday, 20 June 2010 - ALAC and Regional
Leadership - Working Session 1 - Time: 08:30 - 17:30"

I understand the trouble for long flights travelers. But one on five it
advantages the "locals".
Hope we can make it.
All the best

Sébastien Bachollet
sebastien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
+33 6 07 66 89 33


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Mike O'Connor
> Envoyé : vendredi 30 avril 2010 17:04
> À : Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [gnso-vi-feb10] Face to face meeting
> 
> 
> hi all,
> 
> here's an update on where things are at with assembling face to face.
> the topic has been on our (Roberto's and my) radar for several weeks
> and here's a snapshot of where we're at.
> 
> we think the best opportunity for a face to face gathering is the
> Saturday morning at the start of the Brussels meeting.  this isn't what
> we would go for in a perfect world where we had unlimited time, lots of
> budget and people could get away from their regular jobs.  but it'll
> have to do.  kinda like consensus decisions -- it's not our favorite
> solution, but it's the best we can see.
> 
> so we've asked Glen to schedule us a 9-12 slot on Saturday morning.
> are some thoughts;
> 
> -- the WG needs to meet as a group before we present our work to the
> GNSO Council on Sunday (and before we have our workshop with the
> broader community on Wednesday)
> 
> -- Saturday afternoon is scheduled to be a conversation between Kurt
> and the GNSO about the DAG and we figure there's no way we can compete
> with that
> 
> -- the GNSO topics scheduled for Saturday morning aren't quite so
> crucial, so some Councilors might be able to break way to join us, at
> least for a while
> 
> -- we asked for a longer slot because while the WG may not need the
> whole 3 hours, we think it's easier to shorten the meeting at the last
> minute than lengthen it
> 
> -- it's pretty hard to get people to Brussels before Saturday, and also
> really hard on the conference-scheduling people to support us, so we
> considered and dropped the idea of meeting on Friday
> 
> -- we'll provide remote participation for the meeting and will actively
> use Adobe to run the meeting so that remote participants won't be
> disadvantaged too much (except with regard to sleep)
> 
> -- the Sunday GNSO-Council slot will stay the same -- 30-45 minutes --
> and will be focused on presenting where we are so far and getting
> Council feedback
> 
> that concludes my report.  :-)
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109
> fax           866-280-2356
> web   www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)