<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Regarding the Nairobi Board Resolution
- To: "'Alan Greenberg'" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Regarding the Nairobi Board Resolution
- From: "Drazek, Keith" <Keith.Drazek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:51:39 -0400
I think the fact it's "being written now" suggests it won't just be the
resolution verbatim, but instead will be a Staff interpretation guided by the
resolution. Otherwise it'd just be a copy/paste job.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 6:08 PM
To: Mike O'Connor; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Regarding the Nairobi Board Resolution
If that is the case, why was it not said at the start of this thread
as it would have saved us all a lot of time, energy and electrons? Alan
At 13/05/2010 04:27 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>-- Version 4 of the guidebook will include language that that
>implements the Board resolution regarding VI. that language is
>being written now and we'll all get to see it at the same time.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|