<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Free Trade Model
- To: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Free Trade Model
- From: Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:59:04 +0530
Dear Carlton Samuels,
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Carlton Samuels
<carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> To my mind, there is only one rule in context; First, do no harm. I believe
> the focus ought to be on restraints on harms that can be readily identified,
> policed and sanctioned, not on restraints on trade.
>
> I thank Sivasubramanian for this offering. Count me as +1 in favour of the
> outline he has proposed.
>
Thank you for your positive comments. I fully agree that the focus needs to
be on identifying possible harms and ways of restraining harms, definitely
not by imposing restraints on business.
Thanks.
>
> Kind regards,
> Carlton Samuels
>
> ===============================================================================
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> Here is another model that differs from those that propose limits to cross
>> ownership as a measure of preventing harmful practices. This paper may have
>> to go through some more elaboration and improvements, but comments are
>> requested on the documents as posted.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> Sivasubramanian M
>> http://isolatednetworks.com
>>
>> http://www.isocmadras.com
>> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
>> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
>> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
>>
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|