ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Free Trade Model

  • To: Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Free Trade Model
  • From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:55:31 +0000

So I've noticed :)

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
________________________________
From: Sivasubramanian M [isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 June 2010 20:41
To: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
Cc: Carlton Samuels; <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Free Trade Model

Dear Michele,

And I can't wait to say something that is diametrically opposed to your beliefs 
and wishes :) I enjoy doing that a lot more !

Sivasubramanian M.

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight 
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Siva

And for once I actually find myself agreeing with you on something :) (don't 
get used to it! :) )

Regards

Michele

On 1 Jun 2010, at 20:29, Sivasubramanian M wrote:

> Dear Carlton Samuels,
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Carlton Samuels 
> <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> To my mind, there is only one rule in context; First, do no harm. I believe 
> the focus ought to be on restraints on harms that can be readily identified, 
> policed and sanctioned, not on restraints on trade.
>
>
> I thank Sivasubramanian for this offering.  Count me as +1 in favour of the 
> outline he has proposed.
>
> Thank you for your positive comments. I fully agree that the focus needs to 
> be on identifying possible harms and ways of restraining harms, definitely 
> not by imposing restraints on business.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kind regards,
> Carlton Samuels
> ===============================================================================
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Sivasubramanian M 
> <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Here is another model that differs from those that propose limits to cross 
> ownership as a measure of preventing harmful practices. This paper may have 
> to go through some more elaboration and improvements, but comments are 
> requested on the documents as posted.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Sivasubramanian M
> http://isolatednetworks.com
>
> http://www.isocmadras.com
> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
>
>
>
>

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy