Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Single Registrant TLDs in VIWG Brussels report

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Hi Jarkko,

Further to this post ---  
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-vi-feb10/msg01584.html

What is it that SR Registries might want to do that isn't adequately addressed 
by the current DAG contract?

Richard




On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:20 PM, jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Dear all,
>  
> It is my observation that recently we haven’t really spent much time on the 
> Single Registrant TLDs. However, according to previous discussion (and also 
> according to the newest proposal matrix)  it is evident that Single 
> Registrant TLDs could be vertically integrated and should not need to use 
> registrars. The exact conditions to that need a bit of fine-tuning but are 
> essentially available in the current proposals.
>  
> My understanding is that this is something almost everyone agrees on and 
> should therefore be noted in our Brussels report. I would even go a step 
> further and suggest that this is something we have a consensus on and it 
> should be part of our recommendation to be included in the final Applicant 
> Guidebook.
>  
> I also want to point out that Single Registrant TLDs  should be noted as an 
> exception regardless whether we reach a consensus about the cross-ownership 
> in general.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> -jr
>  
> JARKKO RUUSKA
> Head of Internet Domain Initiatives
> Compatibility and Industry Collaboration,  Tampere, Finland
> Nokia Corporation
> Tel: +358 50 324 7507
> E-Mail: jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx
> 
>