ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Single Registrant TLDs in VIWG Brussels report

  • To: "ext Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Single Registrant TLDs in VIWG Brussels report
  • From: "Mustala, Tero (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <tero.mustala@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 14:15:11 +0300

Hi Richard,
 
the requirement to use a separate registrar. As the number of 2nd level
names in a typical SRSU case is small, this is also no real business
opportunity to any registrar. It just adds costs to everybody.
 
regards
 
Tero
 
Tero Mustala 
Principal Consultant, 
CTO/Industry Environment 
Nokia Siemens Networks 
tero.mustala@xxxxxxx 


________________________________

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Richard Tindal
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 12:46 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Single Registrant TLDs in VIWG Brussels
report


Hi Jarkko, 

Further to this post ---
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-vi-feb10/msg01584.html

What is it that SR Registries might want to do that isn't adequately
addressed by the current DAG contract?

Richard




On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:20 PM, jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


        Dear all,
        It is my observation that recently we haven't really spent much
time on the Single Registrant TLDs. However, according to previous
discussion (and also according to the newest proposal matrix)  it is
evident that Single Registrant TLDs could be vertically integrated and
should not need to use registrars. The exact conditions to that need a
bit of fine-tuning but are essentially available in the current
proposals.
        My understanding is that this is something almost everyone
agrees on and should therefore be noted in our Brussels report. I would
even go a step further and suggest that this is something we have a
consensus on and it should be part of our recommendation to be included
in the final Applicant Guidebook.
        I also want to point out that Single Registrant TLDs  should be
noted as an exception regardless whether we reach a consensus about the
cross-ownership in general.
        Thanks,
        -jr
        JARKKO RUUSKA
        Head of Internet Domain Initiatives
        Compatibility and Industry Collaboration,  Tampere, Finland
        Nokia Corporation
        Tel: +358 50 324 7507
        E-Mail: jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx
<x-msg://285/jarkko.ruuska@xxxxxxxxx> 
        
        




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy