<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: "livability"
- To: "'vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: "livability"
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:51:01 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
>
> I do not get your argument of registries using being ineffective or
> having to bear a large investment if they use registrars. Do not
> registrars act as effective multipliers for most TLDs? Registrars also
> reduce the need for end-customer support, thereby reducing costs. The
> use of registrars will _help_ new TLDs to become viable, not obstruct
> them.
If that's the case there's no need to force them to use registrars, and
(vice-versa) no need to require all registrars to carry all TLDs
Obviously the situation will vary from case to case.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|