<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: "livability"
- To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: "livability"
- From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:29:46 +0000
On 11 Jun 2010, at 19:51, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> I do not get your argument of registries using being ineffective or
>> having to bear a large investment if they use registrars. Do not
>> registrars act as effective multipliers for most TLDs? Registrars also
>> reduce the need for end-customer support, thereby reducing costs. The
>> use of registrars will _help_ new TLDs to become viable, not obstruct
>> them.
>
> If that's the case there's no need to force them to use registrars, and
> (vice-versa) no need to require all registrars to carry all TLDs
Milton
Sorry, but where are "registrars required to carry all TLDs"?
Or is this a hypothetical?
Regards
Michele
> Obviously the situation will vary from case to case.
>
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|