RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

I wish to express my view that the poll results should be used - they are an 
accurate reflection of the level of support enjoyed by various proposals. 
It would be a travesty to withhold this information from the report, and if 
that happens then I and others will make a public issue of it, 
It seems rather obvious to me at least that people whose proposals didn't do as 
well as expected are the ones calling fro suppressing the results of the poll

--MM
________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Ken Stubbs [kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 4:22 AM
To: Anthony Harris
Cc: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time

Ken Stubbs wrote:

I have the same concerns...


On 6/15/2010 11:28 AM, Anthony Harris wrote:
>
> I agree with Tim's suggestion.
>
> Tony Harris
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms"
> this time
>
>
>>
>> I'm concerned abt how these polls will be used in the report. I agree
>> with Kathy abt the value of the matrix and its use in the report, but
>> these polls are confusing.
>>
>> I will try to get to the current poll later this week (traveling a
>> lot until Friday), but suggest that the poll results not be used in
>> the report to Council.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: Mike O'Connor
>> Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: Avri Doria
>> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms"
>> this time
>> Sent: Jun 14, 2010 2:28 PM
>>
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> we had a pretty lively conversation on the call about the new poll
>> and concluded that we need a redo that makes the choices/answers
>> easier to understand.  Doodle seems to be at it's limit.  so i've
>> closed the Doodle one and will push a new one (probably SurveyMonkey
>> based, since i've got an account) Real Soon Now.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>>
>> mikey
>>
>>
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109
>> fax  866-280-2356
>> web www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
>> Google, etc.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>