Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Milton about the first poll we did.  I think that was a clear and 
unambiguous straw poll of the level of support for the various proposals.   The 
"atom" poll however I think is somewhat confusing, even in its latest 
less-confusing manifestation.  I would be in favor of publishing the first poll 
result.  


On Jun 16, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> 
> I wish to express my view that the poll results should be used - they are an 
> accurate reflection of the level of support enjoyed by various proposals. 
> It would be a travesty to withhold this information from the report, and if 
> that happens then I and others will make a public issue of it, 
> It seems rather obvious to me at least that people whose proposals didn't do 
> as well as expected are the ones calling fro suppressing the results of the 
> poll
> 
> --MM
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Ken Stubbs [kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 4:22 AM
> To: Anthony Harris
> Cc: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time
> 
> Ken Stubbs wrote:
> 
> I have the same concerns...
> 
> 
> On 6/15/2010 11:28 AM, Anthony Harris wrote:
>> 
>> I agree with Tim's suggestion.
>> 
>> Tony Harris
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms"
>> this time
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm concerned abt how these polls will be used in the report. I agree
>>> with Kathy abt the value of the matrix and its use in the report, but
>>> these polls are confusing.
>>> 
>>> I will try to get to the current poll later this week (traveling a
>>> lot until Friday), but suggest that the poll results not be used in
>>> the report to Council.
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> ------Original Message------
>>> From: Mike O'Connor
>>> Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: Avri Doria
>>> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms"
>>> this time
>>> Sent: Jun 14, 2010 2:28 PM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> hi all,
>>> 
>>> we had a pretty lively conversation on the call about the new poll
>>> and concluded that we need a redo that makes the choices/answers
>>> easier to understand.  Doodle seems to be at it's limit.  so i've
>>> closed the Doodle one and will push a new one (probably SurveyMonkey
>>> based, since i've got an account) Real Soon Now.
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> mikey
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>> phone 651-647-6109
>>> fax  866-280-2356
>>> web www.haven2.com
>>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
>>> Google, etc.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>