ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-vi-feb10] 5% versus 2%

  • To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] 5% versus 2%
  • From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:29:50 +0200

All,

Towards the end of yesterday's session I made the suggestion we had consensus 
on a 5% minimum percentage.  There was a lot of push back on that, but I don't 
think I explained myself well.

What I meant was that if we had a binary choice between DAG 4 language with 2% 
and DAG 4 language with 5% the majority of us would choose 5%.   That was my 
sense from the full group.  

Did I get that right, or are my atoms getting scrambled?

RT



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy