<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] 5% versus 2%
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] 5% versus 2%
- From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:29:50 +0200
All,
Towards the end of yesterday's session I made the suggestion we had consensus
on a 5% minimum percentage. There was a lot of push back on that, but I don't
think I explained myself well.
What I meant was that if we had a binary choice between DAG 4 language with 2%
and DAG 4 language with 5% the majority of us would choose 5%. That was my
sense from the full group.
Did I get that right, or are my atoms getting scrambled?
RT
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|