RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] 5% versus 2%

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Scrambled atoms, Richard.  We didn't even discuss 5%, so I would not agree
with your comment.

RA

Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.


 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Richard Tindal
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 6:30 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] 5% versus 2%


All,

Towards the end of yesterday's session I made the suggestion we had
consensus on a 5% minimum percentage.  There was a lot of push back on that,
but I don't think I explained myself well.

What I meant was that if we had a binary choice between DAG 4 language with
2% and DAG 4 language with 5% the majority of us would choose 5%.   That was
my sense from the full group.  

Did I get that right, or are my atoms getting scrambled?

RT