Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] 5% versus 2%

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

As I mentioned yesterday if the level is going to change, I am more comfortable 
moving closer to the Board's original zero and recommend 0.5%  as a response to 
the proposal of 5%.

So I do not know about majority, but you certainly did not have full consensus.

a.

On 20 Jun 2010, at 12:29, Richard Tindal wrote:

> 
> All,
> 
> Towards the end of yesterday's session I made the suggestion we had consensus 
> on a 5% minimum percentage.  There was a lot of push back on that, but I 
> don't think I explained myself well.
> 
> What I meant was that if we had a binary choice between DAG 4 language with 
> 2% and DAG 4 language with 5% the majority of us would choose 5%.   That was 
> my sense from the full group.  
> 
> Did I get that right, or are my atoms getting scrambled?
> 
> RT