<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Molecules-comparison slides
- To: <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Molecules-comparison slides
- From: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:59:24 -0400
Hi Mikey,
I think Saturday's reports (and your slides) show terrific progress and I look
forward to continuing our dialogue and debate in Thursday's meeting. I think
the atom/molecule exercise was very effective in helping to consolidate 5+
proposals to 2.
I should have clarified yesterday that while the Option #2 report shows a
general consensus from our sub-group's 2-hour discussion, it does not
necessarily represent the official/formal position of the individual group
members.
We need to discuss both sub-group reports in further detail before we're ready
for a WG vote where official positions are crystallized and recorded.
Thanks, Keith
----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon Jun 21 09:36:45 2010
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Molecules-comparison slides
hi all,
i put together a series of slides that puts the two summaries side-by-side,
mostly for my own benefit. but i hope that you might find them useful too.
mikey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|