<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] New Proposal
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] New Proposal
- From: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:56:37 -0400
VI WG Colleagues:
Here is a very high level proposal that is coming out of our subgroup
conversations (not every member of the subgroup supports)
We are looking for a catchy name -- any ideas? (nothing offensive Milton)
New Proposal
**15% restriction going both ways, including resellers and Registry Service
Providers (Back-end technical service providers) regardless of TLD -- taken
from RACK
**Exception for Single Registrant Single User for corporate use only -- (sub
group believed that exception was not necessary as registry schedule of
reserved names already provides for this, but good to have in contract for
clarity) -- mostly taken from JN2
**Exception for back-end (RSP) IF a) RSP doesn't control registry or its
policy, pricing and registrar selection; b) there is structural separation
between RSP function and affiliated registrar function; AND c) RSP has direct
contract with ICANN requiring data security/confidentiality/structural
separation with graduated sanctions including de-accreditation for any
violations -- new idea
**Use of registrars required; registry may select based on objective criteria;
Non Discrimination & Equal Access for registrars selected -- taken from JN2
**Group continues work on Single Registrant Multiple User and Community/Orphan
exceptions -- not necessary to be in place at time of final AG
Looking forward to discussing on Thursday.
Thanks!
Jon
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|