RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Fwd: RE: VI Compliance Sub-Team

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Could we discuss this document in the call tomorrow.



Here are the specific items and questions that I hope we could cover:

*         Who are the members of the Compliance sub-team?

*         Was ICANN Compliance consulted on this paper? Were they asked any 
questions ?

*         There is a statement that unlike the US Government , ICANN 
relationship is based on contract. Could this sentence please be explained?  I 
thought the US Government has contracts with VeriSign and Neustar and many 
other companies in many other businesses.

*         There is a statement that third party surveillance or competition 
would not be timely for purposes of enforcement. Could you please explain how 
the team arrived at this conclusion? Or was it just an assumption?

*         There is a statement that a reactive approach to compliance and 
enforcement will not sufficiently serve the purposes of a new compliance 
regime. Could you please explain how the team arrived at this conclusion? What 
was the evidence that led the team to state this? Was this something that ICANN 
Compliance, a team with experience in this area helped to conclude?





Look forward to discussing these items tomorrow





Jeff Eckhaus



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Ken Stubbs
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 3:23 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Roberto Gaetano; Mike O'Connor
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Fwd: RE: VI Compliance Sub-Team



Ken Stubbs wrote:



Attached is a draft document from the compliance & enforcement sub-team for 
discussion & comment