RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU draft text
- To: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU draft text
- From: "Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:23:07 -0400
I really appreciate your drafting this material, and additional details
for our reviews. I am concerned that a number of new elements are being
added to this material - SRSU now including SRMU. That's new for this
section, and merits review and consideration.
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756 Mobile: +1 703 371-6846
Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz! <http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz>
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr <http://flickr.com/orgbuzz>
See our video library on YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz>
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 1:08 AM
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Revised SRSU draft text
Here's revised SRSU draft text. In the interests of time, I am sending
this to the list even though Milton and Avri have not had a chance to
review it. It's subject to any changes they may have.
I've also included, for completeness, reference to the SRMU exception
that the IPC proposed.
One section I have not included is the level of support. Milton and I
both believe that there may be consensus support for the SRSU exception
among the non-contracted party house members of the WG. If we could
determine that on the list (as opposed to on the call), I can add the
<<07162010 SR Initial Report text.DOC>>