[gnso-vi-feb10] Re: "Rules" for proposal-summaries and Principles-summaries

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Anthony makes a good point. The DAGv4 position should be summarized.

Further, the Nairobi position should be summarized.

Obviously, the point of summary is not advocacy, but ensuring that the 
public comment is as well informed as necessary, and without the 
necessity of reference to external documents.
And, the prior contracts should be summarized, quite tersely, e.g., 
.com was x1% at date1, x2% was date2, and is xx% at present, .org was 
x1% at date1, ...
Again, this isn't advocacy, though these are the positions I favor, 
but in the same interest of ensuring that the public comment is as 
well informed as necessary, and without the necessity of (significant 
groveling to get) reference to external documents.
Eric