<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] interesting results from poll re: proposals
- To: St?phane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] interesting results from poll re: proposals
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:10:08 -0400
I think it costs little to report results on all proposals and I see no
negatives.
Perhaps, given the failure of the BRU* proposals to improve upon the results of
the original proposals, we might (with each groups' consent) simplify the
narrative by removing them. But even that might remove some potentially
valuable information.
> -----Original Message-----
> With respect to (I think it was) Richard Tindal's earlier comment that
> not all proposals be included in the WG's final report because the WG's
> job is to submit the most favoured proposals (or those that have the
> most consensus), is the plan to, say, only keep the top three most
> favored and submit them as the top consensus-gathering proposals?
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|