Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Executive Summary edit

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agree with Tim's statement here.

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
To: Antony Van Couvering
Cc: Mike O'Connor ; gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx ; Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Mon Jul 19 12:17:03 2010
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Executive Summary edit

I disagree. There is no general agreement about community TLDs or orphaned 
TLDs. Those are simply a couple of examples that some have suggested. Including 
them disadvantages other exceptions that have been suggested as well.

Tim Ruiz
Vice President
Corp. Development & Policy
The Go Daddy Group, Inc.
Direct/Mobile: 319-329-9804
Facsimile: 480-247-4516
Email: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto://tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/truiz

How am I doing? Please contact my direct supervisor at 
president@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto://president@xxxxxxxxxxx> with any feedback.

This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the 
addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have 
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and 
permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its 
attachments.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Executive Summary edit
From: Antony Van Couvering 
<avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto://avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Mon, July 19, 2010 12:43 pm
To: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman@xxxxxxx<mailto://kKleiman@xxxxxxx>>
Cc: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto://mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>, 
<gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx<mailto://gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>>

Thanks Kathy -- I would amend this slightly because it was not just "public 
interest" that was the motivation -- it was also fairness to TLD operators, 
regardless of whether there was a public interest dimension.

So, I would change this as follows, removing your brackets so as not to confuse 
further.  CAPS means additions; "XXXX" on either side means deletion:

[Executive Summary] Another principle that is moving toward a consensus of the 
Working Group support is the principle that in the event ICANN adopts a 
requirement of XXXXstrictXXXX separation between registrars and registries, an 
exceptions procedure should be incorporated into the New GTLD Program XXXXbased 
on certain public interest needs where those needs would not otherwise be 
addressed, possiblyXXXX to includeXXXXdXXXX “community” TLDs and “orphaned” 
TLDs AMONG OTHERS.

A clean version would read as follows:
[Executive Summary] Another principle that is moving toward a consensus of the 
Working Group support is the principle that in the event ICANN adopts a 
requirement of separation between registrars and registries, an exceptions 
procedure should be incorporated into the New GTLD Program, to 
include“community” TLDs and “orphaned” TLDs, among others.



On Jul 19, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:

Mikey,
Apologies if this has already been mentioned, but isn’t there a bit more to the 
exceptions process that could be pointed out in the Executive Summary? Namely, 
that in the Exceptions piece written by Tim/drafting team there is support not 
just for an exceptions procedure [narrowly tailored], but specifically a focus 
on the nature of the exceptions to be included.

In the interest of time, let me crib off directly off the Exceptions documents, 
and the questions in the survey, and offer a short addition to the text:
=>  [Executive Summary] Another principle that is moving toward a [consensus] 
of the Working Group support is the principle that in the event ICANN adopts a 
requirement of strict separation between registrars and registries, an 
exceptions procedure should be incorporated into the New GTLD Program [start 
addition] based on certain public interest needs where those needs would not 
otherwise be addressed, possibly to included “community” TLDs and “orphaned” 
TLDs. [end addition]

There was wide support for this, even greater than other exceptions already 
noted in the paper.

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy

.ORG The Public Interest Registry
1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 20190  USA

Main: +1 703 889-5778  | Direct: +1 703 889-5756
Mobile: +1 703 371-6846 | Fax: +1 703.889.5779
E:  kkleiman@xxxxxxx<mailto:clee@xxxxxxx>       |  W:  
www.pir.org<http://www.pir.org/>

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!<http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz>
Find us on Facebook | 
dotorg<http://www.facebook.com/pages/dotorg/203294399456?v=wall>
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz>
See our video library on YouTube<http://youtube.com/orgbuzz>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If 
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




________________________________
Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc. 
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system. Thank you.